Archive for the ‘jobless’ tag
Immy Humes, director of “F**KED: The United States of Unemployment”
Listen to the new episode of Citizen Radio and subscribe to the free podcast.
Interview with Immy Humes, director of ”F**KED: The United States of Unemployment,” the new Salon series that explores the lives of the 99ers. Humes discusses the epidemic of long-term unemployment and why it’s essential to not forget the millions of jobless Americans.
Jamie mocks McDonald’s, Allison discusses Adbusters’ latest call for 50,000 people to Occupy Chicago in May for the G8, and Mayor Emanuel’s authoritarian ordinances.
Citizen Radio is a member-supported show. Visit http://wearecitizenradio.com to sign up and support media that won’t lead you to war, and to keep CR Productions growing!
Correction: We love you, Donald Lemon! Also, sorry, 99ers, the media can’t stop thinking about Weiner
Listen to the new Citizen Radio and subscribe to the free podcast.
Allison profusely apologizes for besmirching the good name of CNN’s Donald Lemon. He loves quinoa and is super good-looking, too! Also, the media obsesses over Weiner’s package during a time of the worst long-term unemployment since the Great Depression, and Gov. Rick Perry is out of his mind. Allison and Jamie adopted two cats! Here’s why you should do the same. A comment on the “I don’t see race” crowd, why politicians sleep with prostitutes, and an announcement of Citizen Radio’s “which homophobic politician will be caught in bed with a male prostitute” pool.
Put down the resume, stoner
Back in August, I wrote about Orrin Hatch’s plans to demand mandatory drug tests for welfare and unemployment beneficiaries. At the time, it seemed like a crazy fringe suggestion from a well-known enemy of the poor. However, it seems like Hatch is no longer stranded on the lonely loony plane.
A state lawmaker wants random drug testing of adult Kentuckians who receive food stamps, Medicaid or other state assistance.
Those who fail the test would lose their benefits under House Bill 208, filed by Rep. Lonnie Napier, R-Lancaster.
Napier’s proposal has won the backing of powerful House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, but critics say it would stigmatize welfare recipients and possibly harm their innocent children.
Yeah, the children. It seems pro-life Republicans have the strangest habit of forgetting those little critters once they’re post-womb.
St. Napier says he’s not a bad guy, but rather he’s just looking out for the interests of the unwashed masses.
“I’m not a hard-hearted guy,” said Napier. “I believe there is a need for public assistance for those who need it, but I understand some are using these funds to buy drugs.”
Napier said the goal “is to get people off drugs.”
A couple of points here. This proposed legislation means Kentuckians must be willing to assume a couple things: 1) Jobless Americans are inferior creatures that deserve to be put through humiliating obstacles for the crime of being unemployed, and 2) Drug addicts are also lesser beings that should be punished — instead of treated — for their vices.
I hate to break it to Napier, but a drug addict who has their state assistance cut off probably isn’t going to rationally reexamine their life, quit cold turkey, run out to secure a minimum wage job (a real breeze in this market,) and open a college fund for their kids. The process of detox and recovery is a long, arduous struggle. If officials are really, truly doing this because they have some desire to see addicts become self-sufficient, they would be better off working to decriminalize drugs in order to place addicts into clinics instead of prison cells.
Now, it’s entirely possible Napier and company aren’t doing this to help drug addicts, but rather to squeeze some more money from the poorest among us. Why else implement such a generalized form of collective punishment? Even if the welfare system is teeming with drug addicts, as Napier alleges, they’re still a small percentage of the overall pool, so why put everyone through the humiliating process of drug testing?
This kind of legislation appears to be another step in the overall process of stigmatizing the poor. Remember, debt prisons are already a reality in six states (no one from Goldman Sachs has yet gone to jail), a system approved by Social Security privatization hawks, Tea Party candidate Carl Paladino wanted to stick welfare recipients in prison dorms, employers check credit scores* during the hiring process (as if a high credit score indicates good work ethic. I’m sure Bernie Madoff had great credit), and some employers refuse to even consider the resumes of unemployed people. College-age students acquire enormous debt due to loans, and they face a dauntingly diminished job market upon graduation, while the poor sustain themselves on credit cards, racking up enormous interest that may permanently bury them in debt.
All of these factors work to maintain a permanent underclass that faces unprecedented obstacles in a dire job market, meaning there will not be enough jobs for everyone. That’s simply a reflection of poor policy and a capitulation to corporations that have a habit of chasing cheap labor overseas rather than providing for American workers. This broken system isn’t an indictment of a welfare state that caters to drug addicts. Rather, it’s an indication that the system doesn’t provide for the majority of healthy, hardworking citizens. In fact, the system is maintained by idiot drones busily testing the urine of predominately non-drugged individuals.
—
Update 12/20/11: Greg Fisher from creditscoring.com contacted me to point out that the New York Times article I linked to for my example of employers using credit scores during the hiring process reports that “Employers can generally use credit checks — but not credit scores — during the employment process as long as they obtain written permission from the potential employee” (emphasis mine). While the vague use of “generally” doesn’t warrant a full retraction of my statement (after all, the NYT clearly must have found employers who occasionally do use credit scores if they said it ‘generally’ doesn’t happen,) I wanted to clarify the original article’s intended report. I also believe the use of credit checks during the hiring process is equally nefarious.
Austerity and blizzards, and what Republicans really think of the unemployed
Listen to the new Citizen Radio and subscribe to the free podcast.
Time magazine editor-at-large, Belinda Luscombe’s, pitiful explanation of austerity, and CNN misses a golden opportunity to show citizens how austerity affects their lives with the NYC blizzard. Allison reads a list of unbelievable Republican quotes that showcase how the rich really feel about the poor and unemployed. In the process, Jamie coins an amazing new phrase.
This, and all CR podcasts, are brought to you by the good folk at Vegan Essentials (http://veganessentials.com/). Buy cruelty-free products there and tell ‘em Citizen Radio sent you!
The morality disconnect
Bob Herbert wrote a very good column today about what he calls the “campaign disconnect” between Democrats, Republicans, and average Americans. I highly recommend reading the whole thing, but essentially Herbert makes the argument that neither party has adequately addressed the economic desperation of citizens. Democrats have decided to humor the disastrous idea of austerity measures, while Republicans behave as though they’ve “lost their minds completely,” an assessment that I think is way too generous on Herbert’s part.
I prefer his latter description when he accuses Republicans of “peddling a fantasy that has already damaged the country profoundly.” That definition contains the acerbity needed to fully grasp how poisonous the GOP’s philosophy is these days.
Yesterday, I briefly recapped the blatant hypocrisy displayed by certain Republicans in regards to the stimulus. Bobby Jindal and Jeb Bush, two “stalwart Conservatives” both greedily gobbled up stimulus cash before returning to their roots: bashing any recovery plan the Democratic administration proposes.
But hypocrisy aside, the GOP, and the elite in general, have genuine disdain for the underclass. The truly sad part is that they’ve brainwashed poor Republicans into going along with their scheme to permanently quarantine the undesirables. That’s when you get elderly people showing up at healthcare reform town hall meetings, screaming that they want the government to keep its hands off their Medicare. Sigh.
Senator Orrin Hatch proposed an amendment that would demand mandatory drug tests for welfare and unemployment beneficiaries because, as we all know, the only people out of work these days are worthless drug addicts. Sharron Angle implied unemployment benefits make people lazy, and that there are lots of jobs out there, but workers just refuse to buckle down and find them, and Rand Paul told them to quit being cry babies and go flip fries at McDonald’s so they can feed their children.
America’s loud desperation
I’ve been wondering lately if anyone in Congress has an idea of what “the breaking point” looks like – the time when the oligarchy will acknowledge the loud desperation of Americans, say “enough is enough,” and vote to ease their suffering. Thus far, the elite clearly think citizens can agonize a little longer before society’s foundation completely collapses.
People like Rand Paul and Sharron Angle frequently deride the unemployed as being lazy and unmotivated, but “moderate” politicians also participate in this stigmatization. Even though Americans’ primary concern is unemployment, the House failed to extend benefits, and it is uncertain if the Senate will vote to help the 9.5 percent of citizens who remain jobless (6.8 million people or 45.5 percent of the total are long-term unemployed, or jobless for 27 weeks or more.)
It’s probably difficult for politicians, individuals who generally enjoy the rewards of privileged lives, to imagine the utter hopelessness and desperation of the long-term unemployed – particularly individuals who have zero job-hunting resources at their disposal. (via)



